Article date: December 2007
By: Laurent Haegeli, Hans Peter Brunner‐La Rocca, Markus Wenk, Matthias Pfisterer, Jürgen Drewe, Stephan Krähenbühl, in Volume 64, Issue 6, pages 804-809
What is already known about this subject
Background
In patients with decompensated heart failure, absorption of orally administered furosemide may be delayed, possibly leading to impaired pharmacodynamic effects. Sublingual administration may represent an alternative in such situations.
Methods
In a crossover study including 11 healthy men, 20 mg furosemide was administered intravenously, orally and sublingually on three different days. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed from repeated blood and urine samples.
Results
Compared with oral administration, sublingual administration was associated with 43% higher Cmax[difference 215 ng ml−1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37, 392], a higher urinary recovery (8.9 vs. 7.3 mg, difference 1.6 mg, 95% CI 0.3, 2.9), an 28% higher AUC (difference 328 ng h−1 ml−1, 95% CI 24, 632) and a higher bioavailability of furosemide (59 vs. 47%, difference 12.0%, 95% CI −1.2, 25.2). Sodium excretion was higher after sublingual compared with oral administration (peak excretion rate 1.8 vs. 1.4 mmol min−1, P < 0.05), whereas urine volume did not differ significantly between the two application modes. In comparison, intravenous administration showed the expected more rapid and intense response.
Conclusion
Sublingually administered furosemide tablets differ in certain kinetic and dynamic properties from identical tablets given orally. Sublingual administration of furosemide may offer therapeutic advantages in certain groups of patients.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03035.x
View this article