THE EFFECT OF LUMBAR SYMPATHETIC STIMULATION ON THE VASCULATURE OF BONE

Article date: November 1980

By: MARIE‐ANTOINETTE TRAN in Volume 70, Issue 3, pages 363-366

The nutrient artery to the tibia of anaesthetized dogs was perfused at a constant rate by blood from the femoral artery and the perfusion pressure in the artery, the intramedullary pressure of the bone and the pressure in the nutrient vein recorded.

Low frequency stimulation (1 to 5 Hz) of the lumbar sympathetic chain always increased the perfusion pressure but the intramedullary pressure sometimes increased, sometimes decreased and sometimes remained unchanged.

The α‐adrenoceptor blocking agents, phentolamine (1 mg/kg i.v.) and dihydroergotamine (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) reduced or abolished these effects whereas the β‐adrenoceptor blocking agent, propranolol (1 mg/kg i.v.) did not modify them.

The nutrient vein end pressure did not differ significantly from the intramedullary pressure and underwent similar variations during stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain.

The nutrient artery to the tibia of anaesthetized dogs was perfused at a constant rate by blood from the femoral artery and the perfusion pressure in the artery, the intramedullary pressure of the bone and the pressure in the nutrient vein recorded.

Low frequency stimulation (1 to 5 Hz) of the lumbar sympathetic chain always increased the perfusion pressure but the intramedullary pressure sometimes increased, sometimes decreased and sometimes remained unchanged.

The α‐adrenoceptor blocking agents, phentolamine (1 mg/kg i.v.) and dihydroergotamine (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) reduced or abolished these effects whereas the β‐adrenoceptor blocking agent, propranolol (1 mg/kg i.v.) did not modify them.

The nutrient vein end pressure did not differ significantly from the intramedullary pressure and underwent similar variations during stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb08711.x

View this article