Article date: May 2013
By: Min‐Min Zhang, Michael J Wilson, Joanna Gajewiak, Jean E Rivier, Grzegorz Bulaj, Baldomero M Olivera, Doju Yoshikami in Volume 169, Issue 1, pages 102-114
Background and Purpose
Adult rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons normally express transcripts for five isoforms of the α‐subunit of voltage‐gated sodium channels: NaV1.1, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) readily blocks all but NaV1.8 and 1.9, and pharmacological agents that discriminate among the TTX‐sensitive NaV1‐isoforms are scarce. Recently, we used the activity profile of a panel of μ‐conotoxins in blocking cloned rodent NaV1‐isoforms expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes to conclude that action potentials of A‐ and C‐fibres in rat sciatic nerve were, respectively, mediated primarily by NaV1.6 and NaV1.7.
Experimental Approach
We used three μ‐conotoxins, μ‐TIIIA, μ‐PIIIA and μ‐SmIIIA, applied individually and in combinations, to pharmacologically differentiate the TTX‐sensitive INa of voltage‐clamped neurons acutely dissociated from adult rat DRG. We examined only small and large neurons whose respective INa were >50% and >80% TTX‐sensitive.
Key Results
In both small and large neurons, the ability of the toxins to block TTX‐sensitive INa was μ‐TIIIA < μ‐PIIIA < μ‐SmIIIA, with the latter blocking ≳90%. Comparison of the toxin‐susceptibility profiles of the neuronal INa with recently acquired profiles of rat NaV1‐isoforms, co‐expressed with various NaVβ‐subunits in X. laevis oocytes, were consistent: NaV1.1, 1.6 and 1.7 could account for all of the TTX‐sensitive INa, with NaV1.1 < NaV1.6 < NaV1.7 for small neurons and NaV1.7 < NaV1.1 < NaV1.6 for large neurons.
Conclusions and Implications
Combinations of μ‐conotoxins can be used to determine the probable NaV1‐isoforms underlying the INa in DRG neurons. Preliminary experiments with sympathetic neurons suggest that this approach is extendable to other neurons.
DOI: 10.1111/bph.12119
View this article