Article date: January 2012
By: Katsuharu Kameda, Yuichiro Kikkawa, Mayumi Hirano, Satoshi Matsuo, Tomio Sasaki, Katsuya Hirano in Volume 165, Issue 1, pages 106-119
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Increased vascular contractility plays a fundamental role in cerebral vasospasm in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). We investigated the role of thrombin and its receptor, proteinase‐activated receptor 1 (PAR1), and other G protein‐coupled receptors in the increased contractility, and examined the preventive effects of the thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, and anti‐oxidative agents, vitamin C and tempol.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH A rabbit model of SAH was utilized. Contractile responses of the isolated basilar artery and the level of oxidative stress of brain tissues were evaluated.
KEY RESULTS Contractile responses to thrombin and PAR1‐activating peptide (PAR1‐AP) were enhanced and prolonged after SAH. The thrombin‐induced contraction persisted even after terminating thrombin stimulation. When sequentially stimulated with PAR1‐AP, the second response was maintained in SAH, while it was substantially attenuated in the control. Only a combination of argatroban with vitamin C or tempol prevented both the enhancement and prolongation of the contractile response to PAR1‐AP and restored the reversibility of the thrombin‐induced contraction. The responses to angiotensin II, vasopressin and PGF2α were enhanced and prolonged after SAH to varying degrees, and responded differently to the treatment. The response to vasopressin exhibited a similar phenomenon to that seen with PAR1‐AP. Oxidative stress was increased in SAH, and normalized by the treatment with argatroban, vitamin C or their combination.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Increased vascular reactivity to agonists in SAH was attributable to the enhancement and prolongation of the contractile response. A combination of argatroban and anti‐oxidative agents was required to prevent both the enhancement and prolongation of the contractile response.
LINKED ARTICLE This article is commented on by Hollenberg, pp. 103–105 of this issue. To view this commentary visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476‐5381.2011.01564.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01485.x
View this article