Article date: May 1999
By: Olga Pol, Lluís Valle, Pilar Sánchez‐Blázquez, Javier Garzón, Margarita M Puig, in Volume 127, Issue 2, pages 397-404
We have studied the effects of μ and δ opioids on intestinal function (permeability, PER; gastrointestinal transit, GIT), and their antagonism after the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of specific antibodies (ABs) or antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) to μ‐receptors (OR). Central versus peripheral site/s of action of subcutaneous (s.c.) μ‐opioids, were also assessed.
Male Swiss CD‐1 mice were used. GIT was measured with charcoal and PER by the passage of 51Cr‐EDTA from blood to lumen.
Morphine and fentanyl (i.c.v. and s.c.) inhibited GIT and PER in a dose‐related manner; they were more potent by i.c.v. route, both on GIT and PER (70 and 17 times for morphine and fentanyl). They also had a greater effect on GIT than PER (4.3 and 1.6 times). DPDPE had a lower potency than μ‐agonists in all experiments, and no dose‐response could be obtained after s.c. administration on GIT.
Pretreatment with i.c.v. ABs (24 h) or antisense ODN (5 days), decreased the effects (GIT and PER) of i.c.v. morphine and fentanyl, while those of DPDPE remained unchanged. The ABs did not alter the peripheral effects of μ‐opioids.
The results show that (i.c.v. or s.c.) μ opioids produce dose‐related inhibitions of PER and GIT, being more potent by the i.c.v. route. Delta‐opioids had a greater effect on PER than GIT, while the opposite occurred for μ‐agonists. Pretreatment with ABs or ODN to μ‐OR, blocked the central effects of μ (but not δ) agonists on GIT and PER.
We have studied the effects of μ and δ opioids on intestinal function (permeability, PER; gastrointestinal transit, GIT), and their antagonism after the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of specific antibodies (ABs) or antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) to μ‐receptors (OR). Central versus peripheral site/s of action of subcutaneous (s.c.) μ‐opioids, were also assessed.
Male Swiss CD‐1 mice were used. GIT was measured with charcoal and PER by the passage of 51Cr‐EDTA from blood to lumen.
Morphine and fentanyl (i.c.v. and s.c.) inhibited GIT and PER in a dose‐related manner; they were more potent by i.c.v. route, both on GIT and PER (70 and 17 times for morphine and fentanyl). They also had a greater effect on GIT than PER (4.3 and 1.6 times). DPDPE had a lower potency than μ‐agonists in all experiments, and no dose‐response could be obtained after s.c. administration on GIT.
Pretreatment with i.c.v. ABs (24 h) or antisense ODN (5 days), decreased the effects (GIT and PER) of i.c.v. morphine and fentanyl, while those of DPDPE remained unchanged. The ABs did not alter the peripheral effects of μ‐opioids.
The results show that (i.c.v. or s.c.) μ opioids produce dose‐related inhibitions of PER and GIT, being more potent by the i.c.v. route. Delta‐opioids had a greater effect on PER than GIT, while the opposite occurred for μ‐agonists. Pretreatment with ABs or ODN to μ‐OR, blocked the central effects of μ (but not δ) agonists on GIT and PER.
British Journal of Pharmacology (1999) 127, 397–404; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702570
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702570
View this article