Article date: October 1993
By: P.J. Chowienczyk, J.R. Cockcroft, J.M. Ritter, in Volume 110, Issue 2, pages 736-738
We compared the effects of NG‐monomethyl‐l‐arginine (l‐NMMA), an NO synthase inhibitor, on vasodilatation produced by acetylcholine and methacholine in human forearm vasculature.
Acetylcholine (83 nmol min−1) infused into the brachial artery of 8 healthy volunteers caused a submaximal increase in forearm blood flow, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, from 3.3 ± 0.5 (mean ± s.e.mean) to 13.3 ± 1.7 ml min−1 100 ml−1.
Co‐infusion of l‐NMMA (4 μmol min−1) with acetylcholine (83 nmol min−1) over 6 min resulted in a 58% ± 12% fall in the response to acetylcholine whereas during co‐infusion of saline over the same time period in the same subjects (n = 8) on a different day the response to acetylcholine fell by only 9% ± 17% (P < 0.01).
Methacholine (1.5 and 15 nmol min−1) increased forearm blood flow from 2.5 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.9 and from 3.2 ± 0.4 to 17.0 ± 1.9 ml min−1 100 ml−1 respectively.
Co‐infusion of l‐NMMA (4 μmol min−1) had no significant effect on the response to methacholine (1.5 or 15 nmol min−1) when compared with saline control (n = 8). Co‐infusion of a higher dose of l‐NMMA (8 μmol min−1) with methacholine (1.5 nmol min−1) did not significantly inhibit the vasodilator response (n = 7).
These results suggest that, in human forearm vasculature, methacholine acts predominantly through mechanisms other than the l‐arginine/nitric oxide pathway.
We compared the effects of NG‐monomethyl‐l‐arginine (l‐NMMA), an NO synthase inhibitor, on vasodilatation produced by acetylcholine and methacholine in human forearm vasculature.
Acetylcholine (83 nmol min−1) infused into the brachial artery of 8 healthy volunteers caused a submaximal increase in forearm blood flow, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, from 3.3 ± 0.5 (mean ± s.e.mean) to 13.3 ± 1.7 ml min−1 100 ml−1.
Co‐infusion of l‐NMMA (4 μmol min−1) with acetylcholine (83 nmol min−1) over 6 min resulted in a 58% ± 12% fall in the response to acetylcholine whereas during co‐infusion of saline over the same time period in the same subjects (n = 8) on a different day the response to acetylcholine fell by only 9% ± 17% (P < 0.01).
Methacholine (1.5 and 15 nmol min−1) increased forearm blood flow from 2.5 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.9 and from 3.2 ± 0.4 to 17.0 ± 1.9 ml min−1 100 ml−1 respectively.
Co‐infusion of l‐NMMA (4 μmol min−1) had no significant effect on the response to methacholine (1.5 or 15 nmol min−1) when compared with saline control (n = 8). Co‐infusion of a higher dose of l‐NMMA (8 μmol min−1) with methacholine (1.5 nmol min−1) did not significantly inhibit the vasodilator response (n = 7).
These results suggest that, in human forearm vasculature, methacholine acts predominantly through mechanisms other than the l‐arginine/nitric oxide pathway.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13873.x
View this article