The CYP3A biomarker 4β‐hydroxycholesterol does not improve tacrolimus dose predictions early after kidney transplantation

Aims

Tacrolimus is a cornerstone in modern immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus dosing is challenged by considerable pharmacokinetic variability, both between patients and over time after transplantation, partly due to variability in cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the endogenous CYP3A marker 4β‐hydroxycholesterol (4βOHC) for tacrolimus dose individualization early after kidney transplantation.

Methods

Data were obtained from 79 adult kidney transplant recipients who contributed a total of 625 4βOHC measurements and 1999 tacrolimus whole blood concentrations during the first 2 months after transplantation. The relationships between 4βOHC levels and individual estimates of tacrolimus apparent plasma clearance (CL/F_plasma) at different time points after transplantation were investigated using scatterplots and population pharmacokinetic modelling.

Results

There was no significant correlation between pre‐transplant 4βOHC levels and tacrolimus CL/F_plasma the first week (r = 0.19 [95% CI −0.03‐0.40]) or between 4βOHC and tacrolimus CL/F_plasma 1 week (r = 0.20 [−0.11‐0.47]), 4 weeks (r = 0.21 [−0.07‐0.46]) or 2 months (r = 0.24 [−0.03‐0.48]) after transplantation (P ≥ 0.06). In the population analysis, time‐varying 4βOHC was not a statistically significant covariate on tacrolimus CL/F_plasma, neither in terms of absolute values (P = 0.11) nor in terms of changes from baseline (P = 0.17). 4βOHC values increased between 1 week and 2 months after transplantation (median change +57% [IQR +22–83%], P < 0.001), indicating increasing CYP3A activity. Contradictorily, tacrolimus CL/F_plasma decreased over the same period (median change −13% [IQR −3 to −26%], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

4βOHC does not appear to have a clinical potential to improve individualization of tacrolimus doses early after kidney transplantation.

DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13248

View this article

• Full article (html)
• Enhanced article (html)
• PDF
• References