Article date: October 2010
By: Daniel S. McQueen, Michael J. Begg, Simon R. J. Maxwell, in Volume 70, Issue 4, pages 492-499
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT
AIMS
Dose calculation errors can cause serious life‐threatening clinical incidents. We designed eDrugCalc as an online self‐assessment tool to develop and evaluate calculation skills among medical students.
METHODS
We undertook a prospective uncontrolled study involving 1727 medical students in years 1–5 at the University of Edinburgh. Students had continuous access to eDrugCalc and were encouraged to practise. Voluntary self‐assessment was undertaken by answering the 20 questions on six occasions over 30 months. Questions remained fixed but numerical variables changed so each visit required a fresh calculation. Feedback was provided following each answer.
RESULTS
Final‐year students had a significantly higher mean score in test 6 compared with test 1 [16.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16.2, 17.0 vs. 12.6, 95% CI 11.9, 13.4; n= 173, P < 0.0001 Wilcoxon matched pairs test] and made a median of three vs. seven errors. Performance was highly variable in all tests with 2.7% of final‐year students scoring < 10/20 in test 6. Graduating students in 2009 (30 months' exposure) achieved significantly better scores than those in 2007 (only 6 months): mean 16.5, 95% CI 16.0, 17.0, n= 184 vs. 15.1, 95% CI 14.5, 15.6, n= 187; P < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test. Calculations based on percentage concentrations and infusion rates were poorly performed. Feedback showed that eDrugCalc increased confidence in calculating doses and was highly rated as a learning tool.
CONCLUSIONS
Medical student performance of dose calculations improved significantly after repeated exposure to an online formative dose‐calculation package and encouragement to develop their numeracy. Further research is required to establish whether eDrugCalc reduces calculation errors made in clinical practice.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03609.x
View this article