Article date: March 1992
By: F Kamali, C Edwards, MD Rawlins, in Volume 33, Issue 3, pages 309-312
1. The effects of pirenzepine on gastric emptying, salivary flow and saliva paracetamol concentrations were investigated in healthy volunteers. 2. Pirenzepine significantly reduced the area under the saliva flow‐time curves (7.29 +/‐ 3.30 g min‐1 h without pirenzepine; 4.19 +/‐ 2.59 g min‐1 h with pirenzepine, P less than 0.01). Pirenzepine had no significant effect on plasma paracetamol Cmax (17.5 +/‐ 7.8 micrograms ml‐1 without pirenzepine; 12.6 +/‐ 7.7 micrograms ml‐ 1 with pirenzepine), plasma tmax (0.2 h (0.2‐0.8 h) without pirenzepine; (0.2 h 0.2‐0.8 h) with pirenzepine) and plasma AUC(0.6 h) (32.3 +/‐ 7.2 micrograms ml‐1 h without pirenzepine; 30.3 +/‐ 6.5 micrograms ml‐1 h with pirenzepine). 3. Mean ratios of saliva:plasma paracetamol AUC (1.06 +/‐ 0.24 without pirenzepine; 1.84 +/‐ 0.48 with pirenzepine, P less than 0.001) and saliva:plasma paracetamol Cmax (1.7 +/‐ 1.0 without pirenzepine; 6.5 +/‐ 2.7 with pirenzepine, P less than 0.01) were significantly increased by pirenzepine pretreatment, but there was a poor correlation between the percentage change in the area under the saliva flow‐time curve and the percentage change in saliva paracetamol AUC (r = 0.47, P = 0.21). 4. The findings suggest that a) pirenzepine is a more selective antagonist of the muscarinic receptors in salivary glands than those in gastric smooth muscle and b) caution is required when using saliva paracetamol concentrations to determine the pharmacokinetics of the drug in the presence of other agents which may influence salivary flow rate.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04041.x
View this article